This app exposes which cryptocurrency a user is most likely to shill on Twitter


It’s a challenge to navigate the cryptocurrency space. The entire community pretty much resides within the confines of the Twitter hellscape, where differences in investment portfolios often lead to in-fighting and disinformation.

This is why one ingenious software developer created a new browser extension to help the general public figure out exactly what’s going on. It’s called ‘Conflict of Interest.’

It’s a simple add-on that presents estimates of an author’s bias towards one of four cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, and Bitcoin Cash.


The idea is that the composition of someone’s Twitter following could be an indicator of their digital currency preference. If someone regularly interacts with a certain community, they could be filtering information to make it suitable for that particular audience, and thus arises the conflict of interest.

This risk is compounded within the blockchain industry, as the line between cryptocurrency pundit and venture capitalist is often blurred.

Is it always advisable to blindly trust information provided by someone who might be heavily invested in that particular technology? This is the question Conflict of Interest is trying to help answer.

This one checks out 

While this is totally cool (and sometimes hilarious), its usefulness boils down to how reliable these bias ratings really are.

“It’s just a proof of concept at this point, really,” creator Luke Childs told Hard Fork. “The results shouldn’t be taken too seriously. I think, in general, the results are accurate enough to be helpful. But there are quite a few anomalies and there’s plenty of room for improvement.”

Conflict of Interest relies on another cryptocurrency project,, for community data. It’s a service that ranks the cryptocurrency crowd on their Twitter influence by measuring the amount of attention generated by tweets.

If a ton of Bitcoiners regularly interact with someone’s posts, considers that person to hold influence over that group of people.

Adam Back is the co-founder and CEO of Blockstream, a software firm focusing on Bitcoin-related projects, so it’s not crazy to assume Bitcoin fans regularly like, retweet and write comments about the things he says.

This one makes sense, too

“I’m doing some post processing on that data, running it through a simple algorithm to try and deduce bias from influence,” explained Childs, who then confessed there’s currently not enough context available for the ratings to be totally accurate.

“There would need to be some sort of sentiment analysis of users tweet content to work out if they are engaging in a positive or negative manner. I would expect that to drastically improve the results,” he added.

A really neat feature of the extension is the way it shows potential biases even in the little pop-ups that show when hovering over the profile picture of a particular user. It makes figuring out the context of a certain tweet that much simpler.

Always suspected Yessi was a big-blocker…

Conflict of Interest’s use of unfortunately means it can’t provide a reading on everyone. It can only give feedback on users featured in its borrowed influencer lists (but, you can actually sign yourself up, so no worries).

For those keen still to try it, Chrome users can grab the extension here. Firefoxers can download it here.

Even users too paranoid to simply install any add-on featured in an article on the internet are catered for (even though this one is open source). They can build and load it directly into their browser by themselves, and instructions for how to do that are here.

Did you know? Hard Fork has its own stage at TNW2019, our tech conference in Amsterdam. Check it out.

Published March 26, 2019 — 17:11 UTC

Read the rest of this post here